so the below has been waiting for two months…the conversation prompted an argument with the guy, who ended up saying “i don’t want to fight with you about science.” somehow – ok, along with a lot of other projects – i soured on blogging and didn’t come back to it, but i think it’s about time to push this one out and move on.
I’ll admit it - when it comes to books, I’m happy to be guided by fate – happier, in fact. In accord with my general lack of organization, times are rare that i’ve heard of a text, written a note to myself and, later, procured it from a library. And sometimes when I’ve tried, going to the library with a list a few weeks old, the impulse has passed and I find myself wondering if I really need that young adult book about enthusiasms just for a mention of Jane Austen.
I like books that have a physical history … found on the floor of the Mennonite thrift store, sale in a high school basement in Connecticut, lost and found baskets and donations from embittered exes out of the pile he left behind. Notes from the former owner (especially in poetry) are great and free is even better, so I can feel that I’ve given a book the home it longs for.
This is a small part of the reason I picked up “The Best American Science Writing 2000″ from a library free cart yesterday. The larger reason is more self-centered. For some time (perhaps since I labelled the NASA’s landing on the moon “the biggest jack-off in American history”) the guy and I have been having some tense discussions about “science.” It’s a flash point both because it speaks to many of the contrasts in our personalities, and because it’s a gendered topic that raises my hackles. He tends to see my mistrust of many established theories as willful ignorance, and in a sense, this is the case. A bit of the Groucho Marx “club that won’t have me” bubbles up when I remember how quickly my excitement for my very first junior high science class was dimmed by my lab partner’s refusual to let me operate any of the equipment.
One of the most interesting articles features that buxom buddha the venus of willendorf…and new research (by women, even) seems to point to the use of decorative clothing items both at the time and as represented in the culture’s art. This leads anthropologists to think that there was a whole world of weaving, sewing, design (in other words, chick stuff) going on that has not made a mark on a modern anthropology, not only because it disintegrates faster than iron or stone tools but because historians were looking for hammers and weapons rather than goddesses.